I think I have always loved stories that arrive carrying storms inside them.

Not just “dark” stories, but gothic ones specifically, the kind where emotion becomes architecture. Houses breathe. Corridors remember things. Rain arrives like a warning. Love curdles into obsession. Loneliness becomes so immense it starts to feel supernatural. Gothic fiction has always understood that the scariest things are rarely monsters themselves, but abandonment, isolation, repression, grief, hunger, inheritance, and the unbearable act of being truly seen.

Maybe that’s why these stories feel strangely comforting to me.

Gothic fiction does not ask people to be emotionally tidy. It allows desire to become monstrous. It allows grief to haunt rooms long after death. It understands that trauma lives in the body and in the walls and in the generations that follow afterward. Other genres often want suffering to become neat by the end, but the gothic lingers in emotional ruin. It lights a candle beside it and studies the shape of it carefully.

I think that is why Jane Eyre stayed with me so deeply when I first read it at 12. Before I even fully understood its complexities, I understood its atmosphere instinctively. Thornfield Hall did not feel like a setting so much as a psychological landscape. The locked attic, the strange laughter in the corridors, the constant dog and firelight – all of it externalised the emotional repression underneath the story itself. Rochester and Jane are not simply people falling in love; they are two lonely, damaged souls circling one another inside a house already haunted by secrets. Gothic fiction understands that people often become haunted long before ghosts ever appear.

And Frankenstein, God.

I do not think Frankenstein is frightening because of the Creature himself. I think it is frightening because it understands the horror of rejection so intimately. Shelley creates a world where consciousness itself becomes tragic. The Creature arrives into existence wanting tenderness, language, companionship, warmth, and is instead met with horror everywhere he turns. There is something unbearable about that kind of loneliness because it feels so fundamentally human. The Creature’s monstrosity is not merely physical; it is the result of being denied love long enough that rage becomes the only language left available to him.

That is what gothic fiction does so brilliantly: it transforms emotional suffering into myth.

Even Del Toro’s adaptation, despite softening some of the novel’s sharper moral ambiguity, understands this emotional core. Jacob Elordi’s Creature feels almost painfully fragile, as though every movement carries the hope that somebody might finally look at him without fear. Watching him felt less like watching a monster and more like watching innocence repeatedly collide with humanity’s inability to tolerate difference. Shelley’s novel is colder, more merciless, more morally tangled, but both versions understand the same terrible truth: isolation can deform people just as violently as cruelty itself.

And perhaps that is why gothic fiction continues to resonate centuries later. Beneath all the storms and candlelight and ruined castles, these stories are obsessed with profoundly modern anxieties: alienation, identity, repression, inherited violence, forbidden desire, the fear of becoming monstrous to others or to yourself. Gothic fiction understand that people are rarely destroyed by singular events alone. More often, they are slowly consumed by silence, loneliness, obsession, shame, grief, or the unbearable pressure of societal expectation.

Even Babel, though not traditionally gothic in the architectural sense, carried gothic blood within it. The novel is drenched in decay disguised as grandeur. Oxford becomes its own kind of haunted institution – beautiful, elitist, imperial, quietly devouring the very people it claims to enlighten. Kuang writes academia almost like a gothic manor house: filled with knowledge and brilliance, yet fundamentally built upon violence and exploitation. The horror in Babel is not supernatural but historical. Language itself becomes haunting. Translation becomes both intimacy and betrayal. Every corridor in that novel feels heavy with the ghosts of empire.

I think gothic fiction often emerges wherever people are trapped inside systems larger than themselves.

Sometimes it is a castle.

Sometimes it is marriage.

Sometimes it is family.

Sometimes it is empire.

Sometimes it is your own mind.

And maybe that is why these stories feel oddly comforting to me despite all their darkness. Gothic fiction never pretends human beings are simple. It allows people to be contradictory, yearning, loving, obsessive, grieving, self-destructive, beautiful, monstrous all at once. It understands that there are parts of ourselves we keep locked away not because they are evil, but because they are too raw to survive daylight.

There is also something strangely tender about the gothic’s relationship with ugliness. These novels insist that beauty and horror often exist beside one another inseparably. Shelley gives us a Creature capable of immense sensitivity and devastating violence. Brontë gives us love blooming inside isolation and secrecy. Even the settings themselves embody this contradiction: ruined mansions lit beautifully by candlelight, storms made sublime by moonlight, ghosts carrying unbearable longing rather than pure terror.

The gothic does not merely ask, “What is frightening?”

It asks, “What happens to people when they are unloved?” “What happens when desire is forced underground?” “What parts of ourselves become monstrous when hidden too long?”

And perhaps most importantly, “What does it mean to remain human in spite of suffering?”

I think that is why I continue returning to gothic fiction again and again. Not because I enjoy darkness for it own sake, but because these stories understand emotional intensity without apologising for it. They allow people to feel too much. To give too deeply. To love too obsessively. To haunt and be haunted.

In a world constantly asking us to move on quickly, gothic fiction lingers.

And honestly, so do I.

Still reading into everything,

diiyabooks

950 words

Leave a comment